If Trump Tower Was Not Wiretapped – How Are There Transcripts Of The Calls?

Trump Tower

How do you get transcripts without Trump Tower being wiretapped?

Liberals across the country today are trying to dispel the theory that Trump Tower was ever wiretapped. However, they are doing nothing but showing their short memories.

Mother Jones (one of the top Liberal “news” agencies) published this back in January of 2017:

And sure, this is sort of ironic considering the FISA court’s 99 percent rate of approving warrants. But there’s also a serious point to be made here. This was a warrant targeting four specific people, so the court treated it like a normal warrant. That meant rejecting it if it didn’t provide enough evidence to form probable cause.

The Guardian also covered this issue in January.

The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The Fisa court turned down the application asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation.

Lets not forget about the New York Times article that was published in October of 2016!

Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.

But the most damning article that collaborates the idea that Trump Tower was wiretapped comes from NPR.

A current U.S. intelligence official tells NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly that there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the transcripts of former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, although the official noted that doesn’t rule out the possibility of illegal actions.

The official also says that there are recordings as well as transcripts of the calls, and that the transcripts don’t suggest Flynn was acting under orders in his conversations.

The official also said there was “absolutely nothing” in the transcripts that suggests Flynn was acting under instructions “or that the trail leads higher.”

“I don’t think [Flynn] knew he was doing anything wrong,” the official said. “Flynn talked about sanctions, but no specific promises were made. Flynn was speaking more in general ‘maybe we’ll take a look at this going forward’ terms.”


Is Trump really that off base with his tweets about being wiretapped by Obama? I think not!


So tell me! If there was no wire tapping, how are there transcripts of the calls that were made? Notice that I didn’t use “Conservative” sources to show evidence of wiretapping. The exact same people that are trying to call “foul” today, are the same people who were reporting it was actually happening then.

Remember when Obama wiretapped Merkel? James Rosen? Yes America! Obama has wiretapped people before. It is not far fetched to imagine he wiretapped Trump as well!

About Robert Zerfing 344 Articles
Robert is an avid outdoorsman who loves hunting, fishing, and just being out in the woods! He is a father of 3 and is married to the most wonderful woman he has ever met! He became obsessed with politics in Desert Storm as he witnessed congress successfully blackmailing the president into stopping a war before it was finished and has been a staunch conservative ever since. Don't forget to subscribe to my YouTube Channel to be the first to see my work in the field. https://www.youtube.com/thecommonsenseconservatives


  1. The transcripts, if they exist, probably come from an “intercept” of a call to a foreign official. There doesn’t need to be any wiretaps in Trump tower!

          • No, she didn’t. It was Tina Fey. You are not very informed are you? Do you get your news from comedy central?

          • Tina Fey said it. Here is what Sarah Palin said….During one such interview in September of 2008, ABC’s Charlie Gibson posed this question: “What insight into Russian actions, particularly during the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of this state give you?”

            To which she gave an earnest, but widely ridiculed, response: “They’re our next-door neighbors. And you can actually see Russia, from land, here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.”

            So many liberal talking points are derived from comedy bits that are mistaken for the real thing.

        • Sarah Palin said it. Tina Fey mocked her.
          Rachel Maddow did a segment on her show 12 weeks ago based on an article in the Washington Post regarding the wiretapping. A reliable source came forward from Intelligence and informed the Post that the Russians had indeed hacked the emails prior to the election in Trumps favor. The CIA informed WhiteHouse officials and President Obama called a meeting with 12 bipartisan members of Congress in a private meeting to debrief them about this very serious situation. The Democrats voted to go public with this information. Mitch McConnell stopped the Republicans from voting to go public because he said that the consequences of going public with this information before an election would be devastating. They decided not to inform the public despite the President’s insistence. After Trump won the election, he appointed McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao to his cabinet. Mitch McConnell is against looking into the Russian allegations because if it is discovered that he knew all along, he would accomplice to the crime of treason. Right now, thevGOP is scrambling to alter 90 regulations that were put in place by other presidents before it is discovered how deep this goes. But, this involves the CIA, the FBI, WhiteHouse Officials, and members of Congress who knew that Trump was involved with hacking the election with the Russians, yet did nothing. This will blow sky high.

          • And you have this information because you have top clearance on some planet. Just because you say you know this does not make it a fact. There are so many variations of the same story and there is no reason to believe your explanation over any other. None. People and news media and social media can say whatever they want…make up “facts” and they’ll always find someone to believe it.

    • WRONG!!! By law all personally identifying information must be removed as soon as it is discovered an American is involved. Fourth Amendment protections are valid to the point they were written into the stature that authorizes this activity.

  2. If there are transcripts, there may have been wiretaps. (Not necessarily, if they were tapping the phones of the person he was calling or if it was international.) But if there was a wiretap, it was ordered by a judge, not by the President. Not saying no one wiretapped him; saying Obama didn’t, because the President can’t. The logic in your argument is absolutely non-existent.

    • But the President is the boss of the agency asking the judge for the wire tap. The President is the head of the executive branch that the FBI is a part of.

    • semantics… So the president orders Loretta Lynch to go to FISA court and get a warrant…and she serves at the pleasure of the president and off they go… SO HOW DID HRC KNOW ABOUT IT TO TWITTER POST ABOUT IT DURING THE ELECTION ???? CUZ SHE DID THE WHOLE RUSSIAN CONTACT OF COMPUTER TO A RUSSIAN BANK SERVER NOT SOOO SECRET TO EXCLUDE PRIVATE CITIZEN HRC

    • The FISA court does not need a judge and can act on a request by the president. The NSA gathers intelligence for the military. As the conaber in chief the president can request information about anyone without a judge. Wake up dude since 9/11 you have been living in Owell’s 1985 book.

    • The logical reply to this would be what judge and who asked the judge to do it. Fave it, Obama wanted his legacy to continue, hearing what was going on in the Republican camp could have given much more information than just banking information.

    • Obama is responsible for all the actions taken, he is the an in charge. If you think Obama did not know Trump and his associates were tapped you are far worse than just niavie

    • The claim Obama wiretapped him is not meaning Obama ordered or did it himself. Just like he didn’t do it to Merkel. But he was aware of it and used the information it produced.

    • Except there were requests and an approval of a wiretap.
      Also, a judge wouldn’t randomly wiretap a person, someone (the president & his people) requested it. That is the way it’s done.

    • Sorry yours is… A request was put in by Obama to have Trump tapped using the reason that security of the nation may be at risk. It was denied. Then the tarmac meeting with Clinton and Lynch happened, Obama submitted another request and it was approved, By LYNCH! the NY Times so much as admitted there was wiretapping but Obama didnt order it.That is how they got around that. If you think Obama knew nothing about it, think again! It is a request to the attorney general of this nation and must be approved. I can see Obama slithering around his hacienda with headphones on listening and waiting for something he could use to rid this nation of Trump. That is his goal and he made no secret of it.I would like to know what exactly the security threat was that Obama proposed to Lynch to get her to sign the order to wiretap.

  3. If this were Obama and he accused the Republicans of wiretapping him, the Liberals would be demanding that the entire Republican Party resign and you know it. Liberals are the biggest hypocrites in the entire world. I despise them and would love to see the entire liberal movement and Democrat Party eradicated. They are as anti-American as it gets. If there are any RINO’s involved, run them into the ground too.

  4. It would be logical and or possible to conclude that the tarmac conversation between Lynch and Clinton included wire tapping since the transcripts come shortly after that interlude.

  5. Let’s not get hung up on Trump’s term “wire tapping” which has a narrow historic context. There are all kinds of surveillance today that do not require physical wire tapping techniques. If the subjects were not in a electronically secure room in which all occupants had left electronic devices outside the room, they were susceptible to surveillance.

    • Beenaroundyaknow – It was Trump who used the term wire-tapping rather than “surveillance”. He made a specific claim. Even if every other type of monitoring activity occurred, it is outside the scope of what he claimed. He also stated “his wires”, therefore anything that happened on a public exchange (where there is sampling), or as a result of a destination is also outside of scope.

      • That really the best the left can do. Focus on exact fucking words. For weeks left wing bullshit media cites unnamed sources. This one comes out and they demand proof. Why? Ain’t none of the NY Times, CNN or the rest of them been concerned before this. Good luck spinning this.

    • This is true. In our embassies overseas, there are special “rooms” for high-level meetings that (it is supposed) nobody can penetrate. There are many ways to “get” what somebody is asylum. Picking up cell phone conversations must be as easy as swatting flies in the summertime.

    • That may be true, but there is a HUGE difference in being susceptible to being overheard and purposely plotting and devising a technical layout to pick up information from a particular source. If you are trying to suggest that messages coming from Trump tower could have been received by accidental means because of numerous airwave devices and sent to Obama’s home, that is a bit of a stretch.

  6. Easy. They were tapping the Russian spies these dummy’s were talking to. You only need a warrant for one side of the conversation.

      • What the hell are you talking about? Yes, she used a private serve. Just like the two Secretaries of State, both RepubliKKKan, before her. Just like almost every member of congress, including Trey “Howdy” Goudy. Vice President Mike Pence, while Governor, used a PUBLIC AOL account!! Clinton’s server was never breached and never hacked. After investigation after investigation including one 11 hour marathon session about emails. The REPUBLIKKKAN Congress found no evidence of wrongdoing! Usually, the president is given a secure smartphone. Dumbass Drumpf decided to hold on to his non-secure phone. If someone had hacked it or “tapped” it, they could listen on conversations, even if Drumpf is not talking or tweeting on it. RepubliKKKan logic 101: It is only wrong or a crime if a Democrat does it! Besides being traitors and morons, RepubliKKKans are two-faced hypocrites!

        • Your comment, using REPUBLIKKKAN is so ridiculous, because it was the DEMOKKKRATS that started the KKK. Read up, you imbecile before you start yelling two-faced hypocrites.

          • You read up imbecile! Google “The Southern Strategy” and “Dixiecrat”. RepubliKKKans have courted the White racist vote since Nixon in 1968! A tradition carried on by Ronnie Raygun, Bush I and Bush II and put on steroids by Drumpf and his NAZI butt buddy Bannon!

          • You know how ignorant you sound when you bring up the myth of “Southern Strategy” and Dixiecrat? ZERO Dixiecrats came to the GOP except Thurmond. And the Southern Strategy? Find me some documented PROOF. Not some blog post theory. PROOF! You can’t do it princess. Sorry!

        • OMG you are so brainwashed and lost, it is embarrassing! LOL Go get beamed back up to your unearthly place…LOL you could not have been on this planet in the last year alone! LMAO @ you. Clinton was not hacked? LMAO again.It does not matter how many others used private servers, if indeed they did, SHE did it, got caught because it is against government policy! You are really a lost soul.

      • What part of Anything do you understand? “Dixiecrats” was originally a splinter party in the 1948 elections -Strom Thurmond, like you said- and it’s also an epithet to refer to conservative Dems that started to vote Republican circa ’68. It Can Be Two Things, young seeker.

        • Don’t forget Jesse Helms left the dems when Thurmond joined the GOP. Robert also ignores the thousand of lesser politicians and the millions of Dixicrat voters that joined the GOP in the late 1960’s.

    • If Nixon had a racist “southern strategy” how come the Deep South went to the Democratic segregationist Wallace? Explain?

      • Anybody feel like explaining to this bedwetter how politics works?
        No? Okay:
        Nixon won because he split the liberal and conservative wings of the Democratic party. Now, I could explain to you how he did that, but Imma let you use the internet or something. But your takeaway here should be: The Southern Strategy isn’t a “myth.”
        Or maybe you just don’t know what a “myth” is.

    • Maybe I should rephrase my question for you to make it easier for you to understand.
      IF there was a southern strategy as you alleged.. In order to show a southern strategy… You have to prove that Nixon ran on some sort of racist ideology to get those racist white democrats. I shall also mention that he was the inventor of Affirmative Action. Racist unions were forced to admit blacks into their unions which never existed before. So, tell me how this “strategy” was racist? Again… I’ll wait.

        • Makes you wonder if -forty years down the road- some young sorehead with no grasp of history will be writing on whatever the internet is by that time about how Bronco Bomba “invented” the Tea Party.

  7. “Probable Cause” – – Wake up people. Probable cause is whatever a particular judge says it is. The feds’ lawyers are experts in “judge shopping”. They know which judges will buy into their stories, and which judges won’t.

  8. Where, anywhere in your post or anywhere on the Internet Robert does it state that the transcripts of Flynn’s conversation with the Russian ambassador are conversations that took place within trump tower. As I understand it the Russian ambassadors phone is routinely tapped. Please don’t just make shit up.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. MUST WATCH! Mark Levin Lays Out Wire Tapping Proof Using Liberal Media! - C.S.C. Media Group U.S.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.